Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. Saranac River Power Corp.

243 A.D. 843
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1935·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Appellant Johnson has appealed from an order of the Special Term of this court denying his application for leave to intervene as a defendant in this [844]*844action individually or as amicus curios. Appellant’s answer discloses that his attitude in this litigation is partisan and, therefore, he should not be permitted to intervene as amicus curies. Appellant owns only seven per cent bonds in defendant power corporation. The trustee of that corporation is a defendant in the suit and there is no proof to indicate that the trustee is incompetent or unwilling to protect the interests of the bondholders. Order unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. Saranac River Power Corp., 243 A.D. 843 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

243 A.D. 843 (Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. Saranac River Power Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rochdale Village Inc. v. Harris
172 Misc. 2d 758 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1997)
People v. Reason
44 A.D.2d 533 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1974)
In re Spangenberg
41 Misc. 2d 584 (New York Supreme Court, 1963)
Ladue v. Goodhead
181 Misc. 807 (New York County Courts, 1943)