Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. Saranac River Power Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. Saranac River Power Corp.

243 A.D. 843

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1935

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 243 A.D. 843 (Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. Saranac River Power Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. Saranac River Power Corp., 243 A.D. 843 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Appellant Johnson has appealed from an order of the Special Term of this court denying his application for leave to intervene as a defendant in this [844]*844action individually or as amicus curios. Appellant’s answer discloses that his attitude in this litigation is partisan and, therefore, he should not be permitted to intervene as amicus curies. Appellant owns only seven per cent bonds in defendant power corporation. The trustee of that corporation is a defendant in the suit and there is no proof to indicate that the trustee is incompetent or unwilling to protect the interests of the bondholders. Order unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appellant Johnson has appealed from an order of the Special Term of this court denying his application for leave to intervene as a defendant in this [844]*844action individually or as amicus curios. Appellant’s answer discloses that his attitude in this litigation is partisan and, therefore, he should not be permitted to intervene as amicus curies. Appellant owns only seven per cent bonds in defendant power corporation. The trustee of that corporation is a defendant in the suit and there is no proof to indicate that the trustee is incompetent or unwilling to protect the interests of the bondholders. Order unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

243 A.D. 843, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/central-hanover-bank-trust-co-v-saranac-river-power-corp-nyappdiv-1935.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack