Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. Martin
23 A.2d 284, 127 N.J.L. 468, 1942 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 209
Opinion
The facts in this case have been carefully examined, as well as the argument of counsel. The opinion of the learned Vice-Chancellor reported in 129 N. J. Eq. 186, is a complete refutation of every argument made.
The tax, as assessed, will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. Martin, 23 A.2d 284, 127 N.J.L. 468, 1942 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 209 (N.J. 1942).
23 A.2d 284 (Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re Estate of Lichtenstein
247 A.2d 320 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1968)
Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Howell
148 A.2d 145 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1959)
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports, 1955
In Re Estate of Armour
86 A.2d 454 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1952)
Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. Kelly
319 U.S. 94 (Supreme Court, 1943)