Central Guarantee Co. v. Barnett National Bank

74 So. 15, 73 Fla. 129
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 26, 1917·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having been submitted to the Court at a former Term thereof, upon the transcript of the record of the Judgment aforesaid, and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judg[130]*130ment; it is therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said Judgment of the Circuit Court be and -the same is hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Central Guarantee Co. v. Barnett National Bank, 74 So. 15, 73 Fla. 129 (Fla. 1917).

74 So. 15 (Central Guarantee Co. v. Barnett National Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.