Central Greyhound Lines, Inc., of New York v. Mealey

New York Court of Appeals

Central Greyhound Lines, Inc., of New York v. Mealey

69 N.E.2d 486, 296 N.Y. 638, 1946 N.Y. LEXIS 1220

New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 15, 1946·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

MOTION by appellant for reargument denied. Motion by appellant to amend remittitur granted; return of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended by adding thereto the following: "A question under the Federal Constitution was presented and passed upon by this Court, viz. whether Section 186-a of the Tax Law of the State of New York, as construed by the Tax Commission, is repugnant to the interstate commerce provision of the Federal Constitution, Article I, Section 8. This court held that the aforesaid statute as so construed is not repugnant to that provision of the Federal Constitution."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MOTION by appellant for reargument denied. Motion by appellant to amend remittitur granted; return of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended by adding thereto the following: "A question under the Federal Constitution was presented and passed upon by this Court, viz. whether Section 186-a of the Tax Law of the State of New York, as construed by the Tax Commission, is repugnant to the interstate commerce provision of the Federal Constitution, Article I, Section 8. This court held that the aforesaid statute as so construed is not repugnant to that provision of the Federal Constitution."

Central Greyhound Lines, Inc., of New York v. Mealey, 69 N.E.2d 486, 296 N.Y. 638, 1946 N.Y. LEXIS 1220 (N.Y. 1946).

Pincite

69 N.E.2d 486 (Central Greyhound Lines, Inc., of New York v. Mealey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related