Central Georgia Power Co. v. Parker
80 S.E. 648, 141 Ga. 198, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 374
Opinion
This case is controlled by the rulings in the cases of Central Georgia Power Company v. Stubbs and Central Georgia Power Company v. Fincher, upon all questions except the item of damages claimed as compensation for the annoyance and discomfort occasioned by the maintenance of a nuisance adjacent the plaintiff’s premises. This is a proper element of recovery under the allegations of the petition, as held in Swift v. Broyles, 115 Ga. 885 (42 S. E. 277, 58 L. R. A. 390).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Central Georgia Power Co. v. Parker, 80 S.E. 648, 141 Ga. 198, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 374 (Ga. 1913).
80 S.E. 648 (Central Georgia Power Co. v. Parker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hammond v. City of Warner Robins
482 S.E.2d 422 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1997)
Sam Finley Incorporated v. Russell
42 S.E.2d 452 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1947)