Central Funding Co. v. Stoll

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Central Funding Co. v. Stoll

80 A.D.2d 907, 440 N.Y.S.2d 551, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10786

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 30, 1981

StatusPublished

This text of 80 A.D.2d 907 (Central Funding Co. v. Stoll) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Central Funding Co. v. Stoll, 80 A.D.2d 907, 440 N.Y.S.2d 551, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10786 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by plaintiff (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered July 9, 1980, which, inter alia, granted, upon specified conditions, the motion of defendant Stoll to vacate her default in answering, and (2) as limited by its brief, from so much of a further order of the same court, dated September 8, 1980, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination. Appeal from the order entered July 9, 1980 dismissed. That order was superseded by the order granting reargument. Order dated September 8, 1980 affirmed insofar as appealed from. Respondent is awarded one bill of $50 costs and disbursements. Respondent’s time to answer and pay the $150, if she has not already done so, is extended until 20 days after service upon her of a copy of the order to be made hereon, with notice of entry. It was not an abuse of discretion to grant respondent’s motion to vacate her default. Damiani, J. P., Titone, Mangano and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by plaintiff (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered July 9, 1980, which, inter alia, granted, upon specified conditions, the motion of defendant Stoll to vacate her default in answering, and (2) as limited by its brief, from so much of a further order of the same court, dated September 8, 1980, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination. Appeal from the order entered July 9, 1980 dismissed. That order was superseded by the order granting reargument. Order dated September 8, 1980 affirmed insofar as appealed from. Respondent is awarded one bill of $50 costs and disbursements. Respondent’s time to answer and pay the $150, if she has not already done so, is extended until 20 days after service upon her of a copy of the order to be made hereon, with notice of entry. It was not an abuse of discretion to grant respondent’s motion to vacate her default. Damiani, J. P., Titone, Mangano and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

80 A.D.2d 907, 440 N.Y.S.2d 551, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10786, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/central-funding-co-v-stoll-nyappdiv-1981.