Central Foundry Co. v. Dower

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Central Foundry Co. v. Dower

240 A.D. 926

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1933

StatusPublished

This text of 240 A.D. 926 (Central Foundry Co. v. Dower) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Central Foundry Co. v. Dower, 240 A.D. 926 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment determining that [927]*927the lien of the Central Foundry Company is invalid as against the village of Ballston Spa reversed, on the law and facts, with costs, and judgment granted in favor of the Central Foundry Company against the village, under its lien, for the sum of $4,481.30, with interest from September 1, 1929. Findings of fact numbered 2, 3, 4, 5, 7 and 8 are reversed, and the court makes a new finding that the time of completion of the contract between the village and the general contractor was to be determined by the final certificate of the engineer, and that the work to be performed under the contract was not substantially completed until after the date of the filing of the claimant’s lien. Hill, P. J., McNamee and Heffernan, JJ., concur; Crapser and Bliss, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment determining that [927]*927the lien of the Central Foundry Company is invalid as against the village of Ballston Spa reversed, on the law and facts, with costs, and judgment granted in favor of the Central Foundry Company against the village, under its lien, for the sum of $4,481.30, with interest from September 1, 1929. Findings of fact numbered 2, 3, 4, 5, 7 and 8 are reversed, and the court makes a new finding that the time of completion of the contract between the village and the general contractor was to be determined by the final certificate of the engineer, and that the work to be performed under the contract was not substantially completed until after the date of the filing of the claimant’s lien. Hill, P. J., McNamee and Heffernan, JJ., concur; Crapser and Bliss, JJ., dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

240 A.D. 926, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/central-foundry-co-v-dower-nyappdiv-1933.