Central Florida Skates, Inc. v. Thomas

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Central Florida Skates, Inc. v. Thomas

393 So. 2d 1200, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 18819

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 18, 1981

DocketNo. 80-1294

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 393 So. 2d 1200 (Central Florida Skates, Inc. v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Central Florida Skates, Inc. v. Thomas, 393 So. 2d 1200, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 18819 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

COWART, Judge.

Central Florida Skates, Inc., and its insurer, Empire Fire and Marine Insurance Co., seek review by certiorari¹ of an interlocutory order, dated October 19,1980, compelling production of the insurer’s entire underwriting file. The file contains information which is either irrelevant to the respondent’s action or privileged and which is therefore not discoverable. Production of the discoverable information within the insurer’s file is directed by Paragraph 3(a) of the order. Therefore, the writ is granted and Paragraph (3)(c) of the order compelling production is quashed. Nothing in this opinion shall prohibit the trial judge from viewing, in camera, the underwriting file pertaining to the roller rink and requiring the disclosure of the properly discoverable portions of that file, should respondent make proper application therefor.

DAUKSCH, C. J., and SHARP, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COWART, Judge.

Central Florida Skates, Inc., and its insurer, Empire Fire and Marine Insurance Co., seek review by certiorari¹ of an interlocutory order, dated October 19,1980, compelling production of the insurer’s entire underwriting file. The file contains information which is either irrelevant to the respondent’s action or privileged and which is therefore not discoverable. Production of the discoverable information within the insurer’s file is directed by Paragraph 3(a) of the order. Therefore, the writ is granted and Paragraph (3)(c) of the order compelling production is quashed. Nothing in this opinion shall prohibit the trial judge from viewing, in camera, the underwriting file pertaining to the roller rink and requiring the disclosure of the properly discoverable portions of that file, should respondent make proper application therefor.

DAUKSCH, C. J., and SHARP, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

393 So. 2d 1200, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 18819, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/central-florida-skates-inc-v-thomas-fladistctapp-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack