Central Elevator Co. v. Schap
This text of 264 F. 102 (Central Elevator Co. v. Schap) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motions were made in these causes to dismiss or affirm on the ground that all questions mentioned in the assignments of error had been decided in the former appeals. These motions and the appeals themselves were heard at the same time.
The motions are refused, without costs, in order that the appellants may have the benefit of formal decrees of this court in any applications they may make and in any proceedings they may institute to have their cases passed on by the Supreme Court.
Upon examination of the records we find that all questions made in the assignments of error were involved and decided in the former appeals, and that the decrees of the District Court have been entered in precise accordance with the instructions contained in the decrees of this court.
The decrees of the District Court are therefore affirmed, and the decrees of this court will be entered accordingly.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
264 F. 102, 1920 U.S. App. LEXIS 1240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/central-elevator-co-v-schap-ca4-1920.