Central Drugs, Inc. v. Pfeiffer

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Central Drugs, Inc. v. Pfeiffer

258 So. 2d 514, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 7277

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 29, 1972

DocketNo. 71-605

StatusPublished

This text of 258 So. 2d 514 (Central Drugs, Inc. v. Pfeiffer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Central Drugs, Inc. v. Pfeiffer, 258 So. 2d 514, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 7277 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have reviewed the record and considered the briefs and oral argument. We conclude that the decision of the board is supported by substantial, competent evidence in the record and is not, therefore, [515]*515clearly erroneous. The procedural errors alleged are not so serious as to be deemed manifestly unfair or considered to be misleading to the appellants. Florida Board of Pharmacy v. Levin, Fla.1966, 190 So.2d 768, 770.

Therefore, the circuit court was correct in denying the petition for certiorari to review the order of the Florida Board of Pharmacy revoking the permit to operate a retail drug establishment previously issued to Central Drugs, Inc. under §§ 465.21 and .22, Fla.Stat., F.S.A.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have reviewed the record and considered the briefs and oral argument. We conclude that the decision of the board is supported by substantial, competent evidence in the record and is not, therefore, [515]*515clearly erroneous. The procedural errors alleged are not so serious as to be deemed manifestly unfair or considered to be misleading to the appellants. Florida Board of Pharmacy v. Levin, Fla.1966, 190 So.2d 768, 770.

Therefore, the circuit court was correct in denying the petition for certiorari to review the order of the Florida Board of Pharmacy revoking the permit to operate a retail drug establishment previously issued to Central Drugs, Inc. under §§ 465.21 and .22, Fla.Stat., F.S.A.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

258 So. 2d 514, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 7277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/central-drugs-inc-v-pfeiffer-fladistctapp-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack