Central Coal Co. v. Louray Realty Corp.
This text of 156 Misc. 206 (Central Coal Co. v. Louray Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Although the Appellate Division has decided that upon reserving decision of a motion to dismiss a complaint until the case is submitted to and passed upon by the jury the court may not direct a verdict in the absence of the jury (Matter of Continental [207]*207Guaranty Corp. v. Craig, 212 App. Div. 236; Gabler v. Goldman Co., 215 id. 333), under the recent decision of our Appellate Division, construing the relevant provisions of the Civil Practice Act (Kagan v. Avallone, 243 App. Div. 437), the trial judge had a right to direct judgment for plaintiff after the jury disagreed; and whether plaintiff’s judgment is the result of a “ direction for judgment ” in so many words or the direction of a “ verdict ” is immaterial. It follows that appellant’s contention that the court below had no jurisdiction to make the order appealed from must be overruled.
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
Frankenthaler and Shientag, JJ., concur; Callahan, J., dissents with memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
156 Misc. 206, 281 N.Y.S. 438, 1935 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/central-coal-co-v-louray-realty-corp-nyappterm-1935.