Central Brass Manufacturing Co. v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America
This text of 904 F.2d 706 (Central Brass Manufacturing Co. v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
CENTRAL BRASS MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND
AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, UAW,
REGION 2; Local Union No. 1196,
International Union, United,
Respondents-Appellants.
No. 89-3436.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
June 19, 1990.
Before BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr. and NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judges, and ROBERT E. DeMASCIO, District Judge*.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the joint motion to dismiss this appeal as moot, which states that the parties have agreed to a new contract provision governing the situation which gave rise to the dispute in this case,
It is ORDERED that the joint motion is GRANTED and this appeal is dismissed as moot.
The Honorable Robert E. DeMascio, Senior U.S. District Court Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
904 F.2d 706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/central-brass-manufacturing-co-v-international-uni-ca6-1990.