Central Bank v. Whitfield

Supreme Court of Georgia

Central Bank v. Whitfield

1 Ga. 593

DecidedNovember 15, 1846

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Ga. 593 (Central Bank v. Whitfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Central Bank v. Whitfield, 1 Ga. 593 (Ga. 1846).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court

Nisbet, Judge.

The .only question made in this case is, whether under the charter of the Central Bank of Georgia, demand and notice is necessary, to charge an endorser ? We have determined that they are not, in the case of The Central Bank vs. The Merchants' Bank, argued at Decatur last August. And as we have nothing to add to or take from that opinion, we find'it only necessary in this case to refer to it.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court

Nisbet, Judge.

The .only question made in this case is, whether under the charter of the Central Bank of Georgia, demand and notice is necessary, to charge an endorser ? We have determined that they are not, in the case of The Central Bank vs. The Merchants' Bank, argued at Decatur last August. And as we have nothing to add to or take from that opinion, we find'it only necessary in this case to refer to it.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Ga. 593, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/central-bank-v-whitfield-ga-1846.