Central Bank & Trust Co. v. Price

221 S.E.2d 71, 136 Ga. App. 302, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 1334
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 23, 1975·No. 51253·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Webb, Judge.

1. This is an action against the guarantor of a promissory note. Pursuant to Code § 103-205, the guarantor had notified the creditor in writing to proceed to collect the debt from the principals, setting forth their county of residence. The creditor failed to commence an [303] action against them within three months after the notification, resulting in the discharge of the guarantor. Code § 103-205. Accordingly the lower court did not err in granting his motion for summary judgment.

Argued October 6, 1975 Decided October 23, 1975. Ragsdale & Estes, Andrew W. Estes, for appellant. Gershon, Rudin, Pindar & Olim, Max Olim, for appellee.

2. Remaining contentions need not be passed upon.

Judgment affirmed.

Bell, C. J., and Marshall, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Central Bank & Trust Co. v. Price, 221 S.E.2d 71, 136 Ga. App. 302, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 1334 (Ga. Ct. App. 1975).

221 S.E.2d 71 (Central Bank & Trust Co. v. Price) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

National Bank v. Moore
285 S.E.2d 78 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1981)