Central Bank & Trust Co. v. Price
221 S.E.2d 71, 136 Ga. App. 302, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 1334
Opinion
1. This is an action against the guarantor of a promissory note. Pursuant to Code § 103-205, the guarantor had notified the creditor in writing to proceed to collect the debt from the principals, setting forth their county of residence. The creditor failed to commence an [303] action against them within three months after the notification, resulting in the discharge of the guarantor. Code § 103-205. Accordingly the lower court did not err in granting his motion for summary judgment.
2. Remaining contentions need not be passed upon.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Central Bank & Trust Co. v. Price, 221 S.E.2d 71, 136 Ga. App. 302, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 1334 (Ga. Ct. App. 1975).
221 S.E.2d 71 (Central Bank & Trust Co. v. Price) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
A. J. Kellos Construction Company v. Balboa Insurance Company
661 F.2d 402 (Fifth Circuit, 1981)
National Bank v. Moore
285 S.E.2d 78 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1981)