Central Bank & Trust Co. v. Norton Lumber Co.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Central Bank & Trust Co. v. Norton Lumber Co.

66 So. 529, 108 Miss. 213

Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1914·Published

Opinion

Cook, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

We think the demurrer should have been overruled. The bill of complaint states a case which- entitled complainant to the relief prayed for.

The hill and exhibits show that the Norton Lumber Company agreed to pay the notes due to the Central Bank & Trust Company as a part of the. purchase price of the land, and, this being true, the holders of the notes had a vendor’s lien on the land.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cook, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

We think the demurrer should have been overruled. The bill of complaint states a case which- entitled complainant to the relief prayed for.

The hill and exhibits show that the Norton Lumber Company agreed to pay the notes due to the Central Bank & Trust Company as a part of the. purchase price of the land, and, this being true, the holders of the notes had a vendor’s lien on the land.

Reversed and remanded.

Central Bank & Trust Co. v. Norton Lumber Co., 66 So. 529, 108 Miss. 213 (Mich. 1914).

Pincite

66 So. 529 (Central Bank & Trust Co. v. Norton Lumber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.