Central Bank and Trust Company, an Alabama Corporation v. First Northwest Bank, a Missouri Corporation v. William Vincent Tucker, Third-Party

First Circuit

Central Bank and Trust Company, an Alabama Corporation v. First Northwest Bank, a Missouri Corporation v. William Vincent Tucker, Third-Party

458 F.2d 511, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9500

CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit

DecidedMay 17, 1972

Docket71-1604

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 458 F.2d 511 (Central Bank and Trust Company, an Alabama Corporation v. First Northwest Bank, a Missouri Corporation v. William Vincent Tucker, Third-Party) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Central Bank and Trust Company, an Alabama Corporation v. First Northwest Bank, a Missouri Corporation v. William Vincent Tucker, Third-Party, 458 F.2d 511, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9500 (1st Cir. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the United States District Court for *512 the Eastern District of Missouri in favor of plaintiff-appellee and against appellant First Northwest Bank.

Numerous contentions have been presented by the appellant. All have been carefully considered and found lacking in substance. The district judge, in a soundly reasoned opinion reported at 332 F.Supp. 1166 (E.D.Mo.1971), demonstrated that appellant’s defenses were tenuous and insufficient to relieve appellant from liability on the cashier’s cheek which it had issued. We affirm on the basis of the district court’s opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the United States District Court for *512 the Eastern District of Missouri in favor of plaintiff-appellee and against appellant First Northwest Bank.

Numerous contentions have been presented by the appellant. All have been carefully considered and found lacking in substance. The district judge, in a soundly reasoned opinion reported at 332 F.Supp. 1166 (E.D.Mo.1971), demonstrated that appellant’s defenses were tenuous and insufficient to relieve appellant from liability on the cashier’s cheek which it had issued. We affirm on the basis of the district court’s opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

458 F.2d 511, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9500, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/central-bank-and-trust-company-an-alabama-corporation-v-first-northwest-ca1-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack