Centner v. O'Connell
This text of 283 A.D. 687 (Centner v. O'Connell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Determination confirmed, without costs. Memorandum: While we are not passing upon the question as to whether this is a violation of the Penal Law, we feel compelled to follow the decision in Matter of Katz’s Delicatessen v. O’Connell [688]*688(302 N. Y. 286). All concur. (Review of a determination of the State Liquor Authority suspending petitioners’ liquor license.) Present — McCurn, P. J., Vaughan, Kimball, Piper and Wheeler, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
283 A.D. 687, 127 N.Y.S.2d 835, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4920, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/centner-v-oconnell-nyappdiv-1954.