Centner v. O'Connell
283 A.D. 687, 127 N.Y.S.2d 835, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4920
Opinion
Determination confirmed, without costs. Memorandum: While we are not passing upon the question as to whether this is a violation of the Penal Law, we feel compelled to follow the decision in Matter of Katz’s Delicatessen v. O’Connell [688] (302 N. Y. 286). All concur. (Review of a determination of the State Liquor Authority suspending petitioners’ liquor license.) Present — McCurn, P. J., Vaughan, Kimball, Piper and Wheeler, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Centner v. O'Connell, 283 A.D. 687, 127 N.Y.S.2d 835, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4920 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1954).
283 A.D. 687 (Centner v. O'Connell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Matter of Katz's Delicatessen v. O'Connell
97 N.E.2d 906 (New York Court of Appeals, 1951)