Home/New York Court of Appeals/Centner v. Monaghan

Centner v. Monaghan

164 N.E.2d 874, 7 N.Y.2d 877, 196 N.Y.S.2d 1005, 1959 N.Y. LEXIS 949
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 30, 1959
StatusPublished

This text of 164 N.E.2d 874 (Centner v. Monaghan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Centner v. Monaghan, 164 N.E.2d 874, 7 N.Y.2d 877, 196 N.Y.S.2d 1005, 1959 N.Y. LEXIS 949 (N.Y. 1959).

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Judges Desmond, Dye, Froessel and Van Voorhis. Chief Judge Conway and Judge Fuld dissent and vote to reverse the order insofar as it affects appellants Centner, Coon, Flynn, Herlihy, Malone, Pancaldo and Schwartzberg, upon the ground that the evidence against them does not meet the standard prescribed and demanded by our decision in Matter of Evans v. Monaghan (306 N. Y. 312). Taking no part: Burke, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Evans v. Monaghan
118 N.E.2d 452 (New York Court of Appeals, 1954)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
164 N.E.2d 874, 7 N.Y.2d 877, 196 N.Y.S.2d 1005, 1959 N.Y. LEXIS 949, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/centner-v-monaghan-ny-1959.