Centineo v. Badalementi

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Centineo v. Badalementi

147 So. 731, 1933 La. App. LEXIS 1763

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedApril 24, 1933

DocketNo. 14435.

StatusPublished

This text of 147 So. 731 (Centineo v. Badalementi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Centineo v. Badalementi, 147 So. 731, 1933 La. App. LEXIS 1763 (La. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellee moves to dismiss this appeal upon the ground that this court is without jurisdiction ratione materise, for the reason that, under section 10 of article 7 of the Constitution of 1921 of this state, the Supreme Court of Louisiana alone has appellate jurisdiction in all cases involving homestead exemptions concerning immovable property.

In response to the motion to dismiss, appellant admits that the case involves a question of homestead exemption, and our independent examination of the record convinces us of that fact. We are asked to transfer the appeal to the Supreme Court, and, acting upon the authority conferred upon us by Act •No. 19 of 1912,

It is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that this appeal be and it is transferred to the Supreme Court of Louisiana to he disposed of according to. law; the transfer to 'be made within 60 days after this judgment becomes final, and, if not so made, then the appeal to be deemed dismissed; defendant apd appellant to pay the costs of appeal in this court, the remaining costs to await final determination of the matter.

Appeal transferred to Supreme Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellee moves to dismiss this appeal upon the ground that this court is without jurisdiction ratione materise, for the reason that, under section 10 of article 7 of the Constitution of 1921 of this state, the Supreme Court of Louisiana alone has appellate jurisdiction in all cases involving homestead exemptions concerning immovable property.

In response to the motion to dismiss, appellant admits that the case involves a question of homestead exemption, and our independent examination of the record convinces us of that fact. We are asked to transfer the appeal to the Supreme Court, and, acting upon the authority conferred upon us by Act •No. 19 of 1912,

It is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that this appeal be and it is transferred to the Supreme Court of Louisiana to he disposed of according to. law; the transfer to 'be made within 60 days after this judgment becomes final, and, if not so made, then the appeal to be deemed dismissed; defendant apd appellant to pay the costs of appeal in this court, the remaining costs to await final determination of the matter.

Appeal transferred to Supreme Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

147 So. 731, 1933 La. App. LEXIS 1763, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/centineo-v-badalementi-lactapp-1933.