Centimark Corporation v. Village Manor Associates Limited Partnership

973 A.2d 103, 292 Conn. 907, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 333
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided June 3, 2009·Published

Opinion

973 A.2d 103 (2009)
292 Conn. 907

CENTIMARK CORPORATION
v.
VILLAGE MANOR ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided June 3, 2009.

Harold R. Cummings, South Windsor, in support of the petition.

Martin A. Clayman, Bloomfield, in opposition.

The petition by the third party defendant M. Dzen Roofing Company, Inc., for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 113 Conn.App. 509, 967 A.2d 550 (2009), is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Centimark Corporation v. Village Manor Associates Limited Partnership, 973 A.2d 103, 292 Conn. 907, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 333 (Colo. 2009).

973 A.2d 103 (Centimark Corporation v. Village Manor Associates Limited Partnership) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Centimark Corp. v. Village Manor Associates Ltd. Partnership
967 A.2d 550 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2009)