Centimark Corporation v. Village Manor Associates Limited Partnership
973 A.2d 103, 292 Conn. 907, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 333
This text of 973 A.2d 103 (Centimark Corporation v. Village Manor Associates Limited Partnership) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Centimark Corporation v. Village Manor Associates Limited Partnership, 973 A.2d 103, 292 Conn. 907, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 333 (Colo. 2009).
Opinion
CENTIMARK CORPORATION
v.
VILLAGE MANOR ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Harold R. Cummings, South Windsor, in support of the petition.
Martin A. Clayman, Bloomfield, in opposition.
The petition by the third party defendant M. Dzen Roofing Company, Inc., for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 113 Conn.App. 509, 967 A.2d 550 (2009), is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Centimark Corp. v. Village Manor Associates Ltd. Partnership
967 A.2d 550 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2009)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
973 A.2d 103, 292 Conn. 907, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 333, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/centimark-corporation-v-village-manor-associates-l-conn-2009.