Centigram Communications Corp. v. Bruce Lehman, Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks, Defendant/cross-Appellant, and Vmx, Inc.
This text of 47 F.3d 1180 (Centigram Communications Corp. v. Bruce Lehman, Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks, Defendant/cross-Appellant, and Vmx, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
47 F.3d 1180
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
CENTIGRAM COMMUNICATIONS CORP., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Bruce LEHMAN, Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks,
Defendant/Cross-Appellant,
and
VMX, Inc., Defendant-Appellee.
Nos. 95-1073, 95-1096.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Jan. 10, 1995.
E.D.Va., 862 F.Supp. 113.
DISMISSED.
ORDER
The parties having so agreed, it is
ORDERED that the proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R. App. P. 42 (b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
47 F.3d 1180, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 22194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/centigram-communications-corp-v-bruce-lehman-commi-cafc-1995.