Centflor Manufacturing Co. v. United States
29 Cust. Ct. 356, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1491
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJuly 25, 1952
DocketNo. 56811; protests 137296-K, etc. (New York)
StatusPublished
This text of 29 Cust. Ct. 356 (Centflor Manufacturing Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Centflor Manufacturing Co. v. United States, 29 Cust. Ct. 356, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1491 (cusc 1952).
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cornmint oil the same in all material respects as that the subject of A. Maschmeijer, Jr., Inc. v. United States (39 C. C. P. A. 139, C. A. D. 476), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
29 Cust. Ct. 356, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/centflor-manufacturing-co-v-united-states-cusc-1952.