Centereach Realty, LLC v. Essex Insurance

306 A.D.2d 23, 759 N.Y.S.2d 664, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6163
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 3, 2003
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 306 A.D.2d 23 (Centereach Realty, LLC v. Essex Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Centereach Realty, LLC v. Essex Insurance, 306 A.D.2d 23, 759 N.Y.S.2d 664, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6163 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

—Order, [24]*24Supreme Court, New York County (Sherry Klein Heitler, J.), entered September 3, 2002, which denied the motion of plaintiffs Centereach Realty, LLC and Legion Insurance Company for summary judgment, granted the cross motion of defendant Essex Insurance Company for summary judgment declaring that it is not obligated under the subject policy of insurance to defend and/or indemnify plaintiffs in the underlying personal injury action, and otherwise dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The policy issued by Essex plainly states that it does not provide coverage for injuries to employees of its named insured, Grandview Contracting Corp. Inasmuch as the underlying lawsuit against Essex’s additional insured, Centereach Realty, is brought by an employee of Grandview to recover for personal injuries allegedly sustained in the course of his employment, Essex is not obligated to provide a defense and/or indemnification to Centereach.

Nor did Essex fail to provide a timely disclaimer to Centereach in accordance with the requirement of Insurance Law § 3420 (d). Although the initial tender of coverage to Grand-view was not directly addressed to Essex, Essex responded within seven days after it received the letter, advising that the policy did not provide coverage. Centereach received a copy of the disclaimer letter, which contained language specifically indicating that it would not be provided coverage. Concur— Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Ellerin, Lerner and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
306 A.D.2d 23, 759 N.Y.S.2d 664, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/centereach-realty-llc-v-essex-insurance-nyappdiv-2003.