Centerbank v. Muller, No. 111113 (Nov. 15, 1993)
This text of 1993 Conn. Super. Ct. 9839 (Centerbank v. Muller, No. 111113 (Nov. 15, 1993)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
"Any agreement contained in a . . . note . . . to pay costs, expenses or attorney's fees, or any of them, incurred by the holder . . . in any proceeding for collection for the debt . . . is valid, but shall be construed as an agreement for fair compensation rather than as a penalty, and the court may determine the amounts to be allowed . . ." General Statutes
The note in the present case sets forth that "all costs, fees and expenses including, but not limited to, reasonable attorney's fees incurred in the collection of all or part of this Note . . . any litigation or controversy arising from or connected with this Note . . . shall become an additional part of the unpaid principal balance." (Note dated July 28, 1989, Paragraph 7.)
"Unless otherwise provided by agreement, interest at the legal rate from the date of maturity of a debt shall accrue as an addition to the debt." General Statutes
The court redetermines the judgment debt to be $144,750.00 plus attorney's fees of $13,900.00 plus costs, as previously taxed.
SYLVESTER, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1993 Conn. Super. Ct. 9839, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/centerbank-v-muller-no-111113-nov-15-1993-connsuperct-1993.