Center v. Lippman

City of New York Municipal Court

Center v. Lippman

58 N.Y. St. Rep. 875

DecidedFebruary 8, 1894

StatusPublished

This text of 58 N.Y. St. Rep. 875 (Center v. Lippman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Center v. Lippman, 58 N.Y. St. Rep. 875 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

Ehrlich, C. J.

The trial judge properly submitted to the jury the question whether the §80 referred to in the answer was reserved, and taken by the plaintiff for the loan and forbearauce of the money, or whether it was not to pay for the trouble and labor in investigating the value of the securities offered, and in raising the money. The jury found in favor of the plaintiff, thereby negativing all idea of usury. We think the verdict was right, and, as no errors were committed on the trial, the judgment appealed frpm must be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ehrlich, C. J.

The trial judge properly submitted to the jury the question whether the §80 referred to in the answer was reserved, and taken by the plaintiff for the loan and forbearauce of the money, or whether it was not to pay for the trouble and labor in investigating the value of the securities offered, and in raising the money. The jury found in favor of the plaintiff, thereby negativing all idea of usury. We think the verdict was right, and, as no errors were committed on the trial, the judgment appealed frpm must be affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

58 N.Y. St. Rep. 875, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/center-v-lippman-nynyccityct-1894.