Center Seven Food v. Zoning Commission, No. Cv95 32 50 22 S (Sep. 11, 1995)

1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 10778
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedSeptember 11, 1995
DocketNo. CV95 32 50 22 S
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 10778 (Center Seven Food v. Zoning Commission, No. Cv95 32 50 22 S (Sep. 11, 1995)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Center Seven Food v. Zoning Commission, No. Cv95 32 50 22 S (Sep. 11, 1995), 1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 10778 (Colo. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: MOTION TO INTERVENE #102 On August 9, 1995, John Pirri filed a motion to intervene as a party defendant in the zoning appeal. The motion alleges that he is the title holder and owner of the subject property. "A person can intervene under C.G.S.A. § 52-107 and section 99 of the Practice Book as a matter of right if he has an interest which the judgment of the court will affect." R. Fuller, Connecticut Practice — Practice Book Annotated, Land Use Law and Practice, § 27.12, p. 497 (1993); see also Horton v. Meskill,187 Conn. 187, 191, 445 A.2d 579 (1982). John Pirri has a direct and immediate interest in the outcome of the appeal. The motion to intervene is granted.

THIM, JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Horton v. Meskill
445 A.2d 579 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 10778, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/center-seven-food-v-zoning-commission-no-cv95-32-50-22-s-sep-11-1995-connsuperct-1995.