Center for Food Safety v. Johanns
This text of 310 F. App'x 964 (Center for Food Safety v. Johanns) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Plaintiffs-Appellants, the Center for Food Safety and other environmental groups, filed this action in order to compel the Department of Agriculture’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service to comply with the provisions of environmental statutes, including the Endangered Species Act, the Plant Protection Act, and the National Environmental Policy Act. Specifically, they challenged the issuance of permits for field trials in Hawaii of certain genetically modified plants. The Biotechnology Industry Organization (“BIO”) then intervened as a defendant. During the course of the litigation, BIO moved that certain information be kept under seal, and the district court granted the motion. The Plaintiffs-Appellants were ultimately successful in the litigation.
Before us is only the question of whether the district court abused its discretion in sealing the pinpoint locations of the field trials. The applicable standards for sealing documents are drawn from Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir.2006), and a compelling interest was required to have been shown in this case because the documents were attached to a dispositive motion, id. at 1179. The district court concluded, on the basis of the affidavits and the other material before it, that sealing was justified due to the risk of vandalism to the fields and the possibility that trade secrets would be stolen. We review for abuse of discretion, id. at 1178, and conclude there was none.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
310 F. App'x 964, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/center-for-food-safety-v-johanns-ca9-2009.