Center for Environmental Health v. Wheeler

District Court, N.D. California·Decided August 30, 2022·No. 4:18-cv-03197·Unknown

Opinion

Assistant Attorney General 2 Environment & Natural Resources Division 3 S. JAY GOVINDAN, Acting Section Chief MEREDITH L. FLAX, Assistant Chief 4 ALISON C. FINNEGAN, Trial Attorney U.S. Department of Justice 5 Environment & Natural Resources Division 6 Wildlife & Marine Resources Section Ben Franklin Station, P.O. Box 7611 7 Washington, D.C. 20044-7611 Tel: (202) 305-0500; Fax: (202) 305-0275 8 9 Attorneys for Federal Defendants FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 OAKLAND DIVISION 12 CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ) 13 HEALTH, et al., ) ) 14 Plaintiffs, ) 15 ) v. ) 16 ) CASE NO. 4:18-cv-03197-SBA MICHAEL S. REGAN, in his official ) capacity as Administrator of the U.S. ) SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN 18 Environmental Protection Agency, et al., ) PLAINTIFFS AND FEDERAL ) 19 Defendants, ) DEFENDANTS FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS AND ORDER 20 ) and ) 21 ) CROPLIFE AMERICA, ) 22 ) 23 Intervenor-Defendant. ) ) 24 ) 25 This Stipulation and Final Settlement Agreement for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs (“Fee 26 Agreement”) is entered into by and between Center for Environmental Health, Center for 27 Biological Diversity, and Californians for Pesticide Reform (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), and 28 Defendants Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. 1 Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), the EPA, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2 (“FWS”), and Debra Haaland, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the 3 Interior (collectively “Federal Defendants”), who, by and through their undersigned counsel, 4 state as follows: 5 WHEREAS, on January 18, 2017, EPA submitted to FWS a nationwide biological 6 evaluation regarding the effects of malathion and two other active ingredients on species listed as 7 threatened or endangered under the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C. § 1531 et seq., 8 and their designated critical habitats and requested initiation of consultation pursuant to ESA 9 Section 7(a)(2), 16 U.S.C. § 1536(a)(2) (“the Malathion Consultation”); 10 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs provided Federal Defendants with 60 days’ notice of their intent to 11 sue by letter dated March 20, 2018, to which FWS responded on May 18, 2018; 12 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed this case in May 2018 (Dkt. No. 1) (“the Lawsuit”); 13 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs amended the complaint on July 25, 2018 (Dkt. No. 18), and then 14 filed a Second Amended Complaint pursuant to leave of Court on November 27, 2018 (Dkt. No. 15 43); 16 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs alleged in the Second Amended Complaint that, in Count 1, FWS 17 failed to comply with its procedural duties under ESA Section 7(a)(2) and EPA failed to comply 18 with its substantive and procedural duties under ESA Section 7(a)(2) by taking final agency 19 actions of registering or reregistering certain products containing malathion in paragraph 84 of 20 the Second Amended Complaint; in Count 2, pursuant to Section 706(1) of the Administrative 21 Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. § 706(1), FWS unlawfully withheld and/or unreasonably 22 delayed completion of its biological opinion for the Malathion Consultation under ESA Section 23 7(a)(2), and EPA unlawfully withheld and/or unreasonably delayed completion of its procedural 24 and substantive duties under ESA Section 7(a)(2); and in Count 3, that EPA violated ESA 25 Section 7(d), 16 U.S.C. § 1536(d), through an “irreversible and irretrievable commitment of 26 resources that has the effect of foreclosing the implementation of reasonable and prudent 27 alternative measures” related to the Malathion Consultation (Dkt. No. 43); 28 1 WHEREAS, twice during the course of the Malathion Consultation, FWS requested that 2 both EPA and the technical registrants (which produce malathion products that are used solely to 3 manufacture or formulate other pesticide products) of the products under review agree to extend 4 the ongoing ESA consultation pursuant to ESA Section 7(b), 16 U.S.C. § 1536(b), and both EPA 5 and the technical registrants gave their written consents; 6 WHEREAS, on April 13, 2021, FWS provided a draft biological opinion (“Draft 7 Biological Opinion”) for the Malathion Consultation to EPA; 8 WHEREAS, EPA then made the Draft Biological Opinion available to the public on its 9 website for a 60-day comment period, which closed on June 19, 2021; 10 WHEREAS, the Parties to this lawsuit (which included Plaintiffs, Federal Defendants, 11 and Intervenor-Defendant CropLife America), through their authorized representatives, 12 negotiated a stipulated partial settlement agreement with regard to claims against Federal 13 Defendants, without any admission of the allegations or claims, alleging violations of their 14 procedural duties concerning completion of a Final Biological Opinion pursuant to ESA Section 15 7(a)(2) in Counts 1 and 2 set forth in Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint (“First Stipulated 16 Partial Settlement Agreement”), which the Court entered on January 4, 2022 (Dkt. Nos. 111, 17 112); 18 WHEREAS, consistent with the terms of the First Stipulated Partial Settlement 19 Agreement, FWS issued the Final Biological Opinion concluding the Malathion Consultation on 20 February 28, 2022 (Dkt. No. 118); 21 WHEREAS, EPA made the Final Biological Opinion publicly available and announced 22 its determination to implement the terms of the Final Biological Opinion on its website on March 23 8, 2022 (Dkt. No. 129); 24 WHEREAS, thereafter, the Parties, through their authorized representatives, reached a 25 stipulation with regard to the remaining claims against the EPA Defendants for the alleged 26 failure to comply with their substantive ESA Section 7(a)(2) duties by taking final agency 27 actions of registering or reregistering certain products containing malathion under the Federal 28 Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act without first completing ESA consultation (as set 1 forth in paragraph 84 of Count 1 in the Second Amended Complaint); the alleged unlawful 2 withholding and/or unreasonable delay pursuant to Section 706(1) of the APA, 5 U.S.C. § 3 706(1), of completion of their substantive duties under ESA Section 7(a)(2) as set forth in Count 4 2; and the alleged violations of ESA Section 7(d), 16 U.S.C. § 1536(d), as set forth in Count 3 5 (“Second Stipulated Partial Settlement Agreement), which the Court entered on April 13, 2022 6 (Dkt. Nos. 123, 125); 7 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and Federal Defendants, through their authorized representatives, 8 and without any admission of fact or law with respect to Plaintiffs’ claim for attorneys’ fees and 9 costs, have reached a settlement resolving the claims for attorneys’ fees and litigation costs, 10 which are the only remaining claims in the case; 11 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and Federal Defendants agree that settlement in the manner 12 described below is in the public interest and is an appropriate way to resolve the dispute between 13 them regarding attorneys’ fees and costs without motion practice; 14 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and Federal Defendants desire to compromise and settle Plaintiffs’ 15 claims for attorneys’ fees and costs according to the terms set forth below, and thus agree hereto 16 to this Fee Agreement: 17 1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Center for Environmental Health v. Wheeler, (N.D. Cal. 2022).

Center for Environmental Health v. Wheeler (Center for Environmental Health v. Wheeler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America
511 U.S. 375 (Supreme Court, 1994)