Center for Environmental Health v. Wheeler

District Court, N.D. California·Decided August 30, 2022·No. 4:18-cv-03197·Unknown

Opinion

Assistant Attorney General Environment & Natural Resources Division S. JAY GOVINDAN, Acting Section Chief MEREDITH L. FLAX, Assistant Chief ALISON C. FINNEGAN, Trial Attorney U.S. Department of Justice Environment & Natural Resources Division Wildlife & Marine Resources Section Ben Franklin Station, P.O. Box 7611 Washington, D.C. 20044-7611 Tel: (202) 305-0500; Fax: (202) 305-0275 Attorneys for Federal Defendants FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ) HEALTH, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) CASE NO. 4:18-cv-03197-SBA MICHAEL S. REGAN, in his official ) capacity as Administrator of the U.S. ) SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN Environmental Protection Agency, et al., ) PLAINTIFFS AND FEDERAL ) Defendants, ) DEFENDANTS FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS AND ORDER ) and ) ) CROPLIFE AMERICA, ) ) Intervenor-Defendant. ) ) ) This Stipulation and Final Settlement Agreement for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs (“Fee Agreement”) is entered into by and between Center for Environmental Health, Center for Biological Diversity, and Californians for Pesticide Reform (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), and Defendants Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), the EPA, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (“FWS”), and Debra Haaland, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior (collectively “Federal Defendants”), who, by and through their undersigned counsel, state as follows: WHEREAS, on January 18, 2017, EPA submitted to FWS a nationwide biological evaluation regarding the effects of malathion and two other active ingredients on species listed as threatened or endangered under the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C. § 1531 et seq., and their designated critical habitats and requested initiation of consultation pursuant to ESA Section 7(a)(2), 16 U.S.C. § 1536(a)(2) (“the Malathion Consultation”); WHEREAS, Plaintiffs provided Federal Defendants with 60 days’ notice of their intent to sue by letter dated March 20, 2018, to which FWS responded on May 18, 2018; WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed this case in May 2018 (Dkt. No. 1) (“the Lawsuit”); WHEREAS, Plaintiffs amended the complaint on July 25, 2018 (Dkt. No. 18), and then filed a Second Amended Complaint pursuant to leave of Court on November 27, 2018 (Dkt. No. 43); WHEREAS, Plaintiffs alleged in the Second Amended Complaint that, in Count 1, FWS failed to comply with its procedural duties under ESA Section 7(a)(2) and EPA failed to comply with its substantive and procedural duties under ESA Section 7(a)(2) by taking final agency actions of registering or reregistering certain products containing malathion in paragraph 84 of the Second Amended Complaint; in Count 2, pursuant to Section 706(1) of the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. § 706(1), FWS unlawfully withheld and/or unreasonably delayed completion of its biological opinion for the Malathion Consultation under ESA Section 7(a)(2), and EPA unlawfully withheld and/or unreasonably delayed completion of its procedural and substantive duties under ESA Section 7(a)(2); and in Count 3, that EPA violated ESA Section 7(d), 16 U.S.C. § 1536(d), through an “irreversible and irretrievable commitment of resources that has the effect of foreclosing the implementation of reasonable and prudent alternative measures” related to the Malathion Consultation (Dkt. No. 43); WHEREAS, twice during the course of the Malathion Consultation, FWS requested that both EPA and the technical registrants (which produce malathion products that are used solely to manufacture or formulate other pesticide products) of the products under review agree to extend the ongoing ESA consultation pursuant to ESA Section 7(b), 16 U.S.C. § 1536(b), and both EPA and the technical registrants gave their written consents; WHEREAS, on April 13, 2021, FWS provided a draft biological opinion (“Draft Biological Opinion”) for the Malathion Consultation to EPA; WHEREAS, EPA then made the Draft Biological Opinion available to the public on its website for a 60-day comment period, which closed on June 19, 2021; WHEREAS, the Parties to this lawsuit (which included Plaintiffs, Federal Defendants, and Intervenor-Defendant CropLife America), through their authorized representatives, negotiated a stipulated partial settlement agreement with regard to claims against Federal Defendants, without any admission of the allegations or claims, alleging violations of their procedural duties concerning completion of a Final Biological Opinion pursuant to ESA Section 7(a)(2) in Counts 1 and 2 set forth in Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint (“First Stipulated Partial Settlement Agreement”), which the Court entered on January 4, 2022 (Dkt. Nos. 111, 112); WHEREAS, consistent with the terms of the First Stipulated Partial Settlement Agreement, FWS issued the Final Biological Opinion concluding the Malathion Consultation on February 28, 2022 (Dkt. No. 118); WHEREAS, EPA made the Final Biological Opinion publicly available and announced its determination to implement the terms of the Final Biological Opinion on its website on March 8, 2022 (Dkt. No. 129); WHEREAS, thereafter, the Parties, through their authorized representatives, reached a stipulation with regard to the remaining claims against the EPA Defendants for the alleged failure to comply with their substantive ESA Section 7(a)(2) duties by taking final agency actions of registering or reregistering certain products containing malathion under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act without first completing ESA consultation (as set forth in paragraph 84 of Count 1 in the Second Amended Complaint); the alleged unlawful withholding and/or unreasonable delay pursuant to Section 706(1) of the APA, 5 U.S.C. § 706(1), of completion of their substantive duties under ESA Section 7(a)(2) as set forth in Count 2; and the alleged violations of ESA Section 7(d), 16 U.S.C. § 1536(d), as set forth in Count 3 (“Second Stipulated Partial Settlement Agreement), which the Court entered on April 13, 2022 (Dkt. Nos. 123, 125); WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and Federal Defendants, through their authorized representatives, and without any admission of fact or law with respect to Plaintiffs’ claim for attorneys’ fees and costs, have reached a settlement resolving the claims for attorneys’ fees and litigation costs, which are the only remaining claims in the case; WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and Federal Defendants agree that settlement in the manner described below is in the public interest and is an appropriate way to resolve the dispute between them regarding attorneys’ fees and costs without motion practice; WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and Federal Defendants desire to compromise and settle Plaintiffs’ claims for attorneys’ fees and costs according to the terms set forth below, and thus agree hereto to this Fee Agreement: 1. Federal Defendants shall pay and Plaintiffs shall accept Three Hundred and Eighty-Five Thousand dollars ($385,000.00) in full settlement of all Plaintiffs’ claim under any authority for attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses incurred in the Lawsuit, including in pursuit of their claims for such fees, costs, and expenses. 2. Plaintiffs agree to accept the $385,000.00 payment set fort

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Center for Environmental Health v. Wheeler, (N.D. Cal. 2022).

Center for Environmental Health v. Wheeler (Center for Environmental Health v. Wheeler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America
511 U.S. 375 (Supreme Court, 1994)