Center for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL CV 21—144-M-DWM DIVERSITY, Plaintiff, ORDER Vs. UNITED STATES FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE, et al., Defendants.
The parties, having reached a stipulated settlement agreement in this case, IT IS ORDERED that the parties’ Stipulated Settlement Agreement, (Doc. 28), is ADOPTED, with the limitation stated below. IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that the above-captioned cause is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and all deadlines are VACATED. The Court declines to retain jurisdiction over enforcement of the parties’ settlement agreement. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 381 (1994). jw DATED this BU day of November, 2022. ae
Donald W“ Moll , District Judge United pe Court 1 :
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Center for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Center for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.