UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 21-cv-2210 (JDB) U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and MICHAEL REGAN, in his Official capacity as Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Defendants.
ORDER
Upon consideration of [15] the Unopposed Motion for Entry of Consent Decree, and the
entire record herein, it is hereby
ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED; and it is further
ORDERED that the attached consent decree is ENTERED.
SO ORDERED. Digitally signed by John D.
John D. Bates Bates Date: 2022.07.25 10:31:57 -04'00'
JOHN D. BATES United States District Judge
Dated: July 25, 2022 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL ) DIVERSITY ) ) Plaintiff, ) Case No.: 1:21-cv-2210-JDB ) v. ) ) U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ) AGENCY and MICHAEL REGAN, in his ) Official capacity as Administrator, U.S. ) Environmental Protection Agency, ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________)
CONSENT DECREE
WHEREAS, on August 19, 2021, Plaintiff the Center for Biological Diversity (“CBD” or
“Plaintiff”) filed the above-captioned matter against the United States Environmental Protection
Agency and its Administrator in his official capacity (collectively “EPA” or “Defendants”). See
Compl. (ECF No. 1);
WHEREAS, Plaintiff alleges that EPA has failed to undertake certain non-discretionary
duties under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA” or “the Act”), 42 U.S.C.
§§ 6901-6992k, and that such alleged failure is actionable under 42 U.S.C. § 6972(a)(2), or,
alternatively, the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 551-559, 701-706. See Compl. ¶¶ 4,
10-12;
WHEREAS, Plaintiff alleges that it filed a petition with EPA to classify discarded
polyvinyl chloride (“PVC”) as hazardous waste under RCRA and that EPA has failed to perform
its non-discretionary duty to “take action” on Plaintiff’s petition within a “reasonable time” as
required by 42 U.S.C. § 6974(a). See Compl. ¶¶ 9-11. WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to a settlement of this action without admission of any
issue of fact or law, except as expressly provided herein;
WHEREAS, the Parties, by entering into this Consent Decree, do not waive or limit any
claim, remedy, or defense, on any grounds, related to any final EPA action;
WHEREAS, the Parties consider this Consent Decree to be an adequate and equitable
resolution of all the claims in this matter and therefore wish to effectuate a settlement;
WHEREAS, it is in the interest of the public, Plaintiff, EPA, and judicial economy to
resolve this matter without protracted litigation;
WHEREAS, the Court, by entering this Consent Decree, finds that the Consent Decree is
fair, reasonable, in the public interest, and consistent with RCRA and the APA;
NOW THEREFORE, before the taking of testimony, without trial or determination of any
issues of fact or law, and upon the consent of the Parties, it is hereby ordered, adjudged, and
decreed that:
1. This Court has jurisdiction over the claims set forth in Plaintiff’s Complaint and
may order the relief contained in the Consent Decree. Venue is proper in the United States
District Court for the District of Columbia.
2. If CBD executes this Consent Decree by April 20, 2022, then, no later than January
20, 2023, pursuant to 40 C.F.R. § 260.20(c), EPA shall sign a tentative decision on Plaintiff’s
petition to classify discarded PVC as hazardous waste under RCRA. If CBD does not execute this
Consent Decree by April 20, then EPA shall sign a tentative decision no later than nine months
after the date CBD executes this Consent Decree. EPA shall receive comments on this tentative
decision, and respond, as appropriate, even if its tentative decision is to deny Plaintiff’s petition.
2 3. No later than two years after the signature of this consent decree by Plaintiff, EPA
shall sign a final decision on Plaintiff’s petition.
4. Upon signing the documents described in Paragraphs 2-3, the appropriate EPA
official shall forward each such document to the Office of the Federal Register for review and
publication in the Federal Register. Following such delivery to the Office of the Federal Register,
EPA shall not take any action (other than is necessary to correct any typographical errors or other
errors in form) to delay or otherwise interfere with the publication of each such notice in the
Federal Register.
5. Within seven (7) business days after forwarding the documents described in
Paragraphs 2–3 to the Office of the Federal Register, EPA shall send copies of such documents to
Plaintiffs.
6. The deadlines set forth in Paragraphs 2–3 may be extended (a) by written
stipulation of the Parties with notice to the Court, or (b) by the Court following a motion by EPA
for good cause shown pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and upon consideration of
any response by Plaintiff and any reply by EPA. Any other provision of this Consent Decree also
may be modified by the Court following motion of an undersigned party for good cause shown
pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and upon consideration of any response by a non-
moving party and any reply.
7. The Parties shall not challenge the terms of this Consent Decree or this Court’s
jurisdiction to enter and enforce this Consent Decree.
8. Except as provided herein, nothing in this Consent Decree shall be construed to
limit or modify any discretion accorded to EPA by RCRA or the APA or by general principles of
administrative law in taking the actions that are the subject of this Consent Decree, including the
discretion to alter, amend, or revise any final actions promulgated pursuant to this Consent Decree.
3 EPA’s obligation to perform each action specified in this Consent Decree does not constitute a
limitation or modification of EPA’s discretion within the meaning of this paragraph.
9. Nothing in this Consent Decree shall be construed to confer upon this Court
jurisdiction to review any issues that are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States
Courts of Appeals pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 6976. Nothing in the terms of this Consent Decree
shall be construed to waive, limit, or modify any remedies, rights to seek judicial review, or
defenses the Parties may have under 42 U.S.C. § 6976.
10. Any notices required or provided for by this Consent Decree shall be in writing, via
electronic mail or other means, and sent to the following (or to any new address of counsel as filed
and listed in the docket of the above-captioned matter, at a future date):
a.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 21-cv-2210 (JDB) U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and MICHAEL REGAN, in his Official capacity as Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Defendants.
ORDER
Upon consideration of [15] the Unopposed Motion for Entry of Consent Decree, and the
entire record herein, it is hereby
ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED; and it is further
ORDERED that the attached consent decree is ENTERED.
SO ORDERED. Digitally signed by John D.
John D. Bates Bates Date: 2022.07.25 10:31:57 -04'00'
JOHN D. BATES United States District Judge
Dated: July 25, 2022 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL ) DIVERSITY ) ) Plaintiff, ) Case No.: 1:21-cv-2210-JDB ) v. ) ) U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ) AGENCY and MICHAEL REGAN, in his ) Official capacity as Administrator, U.S. ) Environmental Protection Agency, ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________)
CONSENT DECREE
WHEREAS, on August 19, 2021, Plaintiff the Center for Biological Diversity (“CBD” or
“Plaintiff”) filed the above-captioned matter against the United States Environmental Protection
Agency and its Administrator in his official capacity (collectively “EPA” or “Defendants”). See
Compl. (ECF No. 1);
WHEREAS, Plaintiff alleges that EPA has failed to undertake certain non-discretionary
duties under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA” or “the Act”), 42 U.S.C.
§§ 6901-6992k, and that such alleged failure is actionable under 42 U.S.C. § 6972(a)(2), or,
alternatively, the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 551-559, 701-706. See Compl. ¶¶ 4,
10-12;
WHEREAS, Plaintiff alleges that it filed a petition with EPA to classify discarded
polyvinyl chloride (“PVC”) as hazardous waste under RCRA and that EPA has failed to perform
its non-discretionary duty to “take action” on Plaintiff’s petition within a “reasonable time” as
required by 42 U.S.C. § 6974(a). See Compl. ¶¶ 9-11. WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to a settlement of this action without admission of any
issue of fact or law, except as expressly provided herein;
WHEREAS, the Parties, by entering into this Consent Decree, do not waive or limit any
claim, remedy, or defense, on any grounds, related to any final EPA action;
WHEREAS, the Parties consider this Consent Decree to be an adequate and equitable
resolution of all the claims in this matter and therefore wish to effectuate a settlement;
WHEREAS, it is in the interest of the public, Plaintiff, EPA, and judicial economy to
resolve this matter without protracted litigation;
WHEREAS, the Court, by entering this Consent Decree, finds that the Consent Decree is
fair, reasonable, in the public interest, and consistent with RCRA and the APA;
NOW THEREFORE, before the taking of testimony, without trial or determination of any
issues of fact or law, and upon the consent of the Parties, it is hereby ordered, adjudged, and
decreed that:
1. This Court has jurisdiction over the claims set forth in Plaintiff’s Complaint and
may order the relief contained in the Consent Decree. Venue is proper in the United States
District Court for the District of Columbia.
2. If CBD executes this Consent Decree by April 20, 2022, then, no later than January
20, 2023, pursuant to 40 C.F.R. § 260.20(c), EPA shall sign a tentative decision on Plaintiff’s
petition to classify discarded PVC as hazardous waste under RCRA. If CBD does not execute this
Consent Decree by April 20, then EPA shall sign a tentative decision no later than nine months
after the date CBD executes this Consent Decree. EPA shall receive comments on this tentative
decision, and respond, as appropriate, even if its tentative decision is to deny Plaintiff’s petition.
2 3. No later than two years after the signature of this consent decree by Plaintiff, EPA
shall sign a final decision on Plaintiff’s petition.
4. Upon signing the documents described in Paragraphs 2-3, the appropriate EPA
official shall forward each such document to the Office of the Federal Register for review and
publication in the Federal Register. Following such delivery to the Office of the Federal Register,
EPA shall not take any action (other than is necessary to correct any typographical errors or other
errors in form) to delay or otherwise interfere with the publication of each such notice in the
Federal Register.
5. Within seven (7) business days after forwarding the documents described in
Paragraphs 2–3 to the Office of the Federal Register, EPA shall send copies of such documents to
Plaintiffs.
6. The deadlines set forth in Paragraphs 2–3 may be extended (a) by written
stipulation of the Parties with notice to the Court, or (b) by the Court following a motion by EPA
for good cause shown pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and upon consideration of
any response by Plaintiff and any reply by EPA. Any other provision of this Consent Decree also
may be modified by the Court following motion of an undersigned party for good cause shown
pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and upon consideration of any response by a non-
moving party and any reply.
7. The Parties shall not challenge the terms of this Consent Decree or this Court’s
jurisdiction to enter and enforce this Consent Decree.
8. Except as provided herein, nothing in this Consent Decree shall be construed to
limit or modify any discretion accorded to EPA by RCRA or the APA or by general principles of
administrative law in taking the actions that are the subject of this Consent Decree, including the
discretion to alter, amend, or revise any final actions promulgated pursuant to this Consent Decree.
3 EPA’s obligation to perform each action specified in this Consent Decree does not constitute a
limitation or modification of EPA’s discretion within the meaning of this paragraph.
9. Nothing in this Consent Decree shall be construed to confer upon this Court
jurisdiction to review any issues that are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States
Courts of Appeals pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 6976. Nothing in the terms of this Consent Decree
shall be construed to waive, limit, or modify any remedies, rights to seek judicial review, or
defenses the Parties may have under 42 U.S.C. § 6976.
10. Any notices required or provided for by this Consent Decree shall be in writing, via
electronic mail or other means, and sent to the following (or to any new address of counsel as filed
and listed in the docket of the above-captioned matter, at a future date):
a. For Plaintiff the Center for Biological Diversity:
Kristen Monsell Emily Jeffers Center for Biological Diversity 1212 Broadway, Suite 800 Oakland, CA 94612 Email: kmonsell@biologicaldiversity.org Email: ejeffers@biologicaldiversity.org
b. For Defendants EPA and Michael Regan in his official capacity:
Mark L. Walters U.S. Department of Justice Environmental and Natural Resources Division Environmental Defense Section P.O. Box 7611 Washington, D.C. 20044 Email: mark.walters@usdoj.gov
11. The obligations imposed on EPA under this Consent Decree can only be
undertaken using appropriated funds legally available for such purpose. No provision of this
Consent Decree shall be interpreted as or constitute a commitment or requirement that EPA
4 obligate funds in contravention of the Anti-Deficiency Act, 31 U.S.C. § 1341, or any other
applicable statute.
12. The Parties recognize that the possibility exists that a lapse in the appropriations
that fund EPA could delay compliance with the timetables in this Consent Decree. If a lapse in
appropriations for EPA occurs within one hundred twenty (120) days before any deadline in this
Consent Decree, that deadline shall be automatically extended one day for each day of the lapse in
appropriations. Nothing in this paragraph shall preclude EPA from seeking an additional
extension through stipulation of the Parties or modification of this Consent Decree under
Paragraph 7.
13. The Parties agree that this Consent Decree shall constitute a complete and final
settlement of all claims in the Complaint.
14. In the event of a dispute between the Parties concerning the interpretation or
implementation of any aspect of this Consent Decree, the disputing party shall provide the other
party with a written notice outlining the nature of the dispute and requesting informal negotiations.
The Parties shall meet and confer to attempt to resolve the dispute. If the Parties cannot reach an
agreed-upon resolution within fifteen (15) business days after receipt of the notice, any party may
move the Court to resolve the dispute.
15. No motion or other proceeding seeking to enforce this Consent Decree or for
contempt of court shall be filed unless the procedure set forth in Paragraph 14 has been followed.
16. The deadline for filing a motion for Plaintiff’s costs of litigation (including
reasonable attorneys’ fees) for activities performed prior to entry of the Consent Decree is hereby
extended until ninety (90) days after this Consent Decree is entered by the Court. During this
period, the Parties shall seek to resolve informally any claim for costs of litigation (including
reasonable attorneys’ fees), and if they cannot, Plaintiff will file a motion for costs of litigation
5 (including reasonable attorneys’ fees) or a stipulation or motion to extend the deadline to file such
a motion. EPA reserves the right to oppose any such request.
17. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to determine and effectuate compliance with this
Consent Decree, to resolve any disputes thereunder, and to consider any requests for costs of
litigation (including reasonable attorneys’ fees). After publication in the Federal Register of the
final decision on Plaintiff’s petition described in Paragraph 3 and resolution of Plaintiff’s claim for
costs of litigation, including attorneys’ fees, EPA may move to have this Consent Decree
terminated. Plaintiff shall have thirty (30) days in which to respond to such a motion, unless the
Parties stipulate to a longer time for Plaintiff to respond.
18. If for any reason the Court declines to approve this Consent Decree in the form
presented, this agreement is voidable at the sole discretion of either Party and the Proposed
Consent Decree’s terms may not be used as evidence in any litigation between the Parties.
19. The Parties treat this Consent Decree as jointly drafted, and any rules of
construction that construe any ambiguities in this document against the drafting party shall be
inapplicable in any dispute concerning the interpretation of this Consent Decree.
20. The Parties agree and acknowledge that before this Consent Decree will be
finalized and entered by the Court, EPA will provide notice of this Consent Decree in the Federal
Register and an opportunity for public comment for 30 days. After this Consent Decree has
undergone notice and comment, the Administrator and/or the Attorney General, as appropriate,
shall promptly consider any written comments in determining whether to withdraw or withhold
their consent to this Consent Decree. If the Administrator and/or the Attorney General do not elect
to withdraw or withhold consent, EPA intends to promptly file a motion that requests that the
Court enter this Consent Decree.
6 21. This Consent Decree applies to, is binding upon, and inures to the benefit of the
Parties (and their successors, assigns, and designees).
22. The undersigned representatives of Plaintiff and Defendants EPA and Michael
Regan, in his official capacity, certify that they are fully authorized by the party they represent to
consent to the Court’s entry of the terms and conditions of this Consent Decree.
SO ORDERED on this __25th__ day of ___July____, 2022.
John D. Bates Digitally signed by John D. Bates Date: 2022.07.25 10:32:57 -04'00' _______________________________________________ Honorable John D. Bates United States District Judge
7 COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF:
Dated: April ___, 2022
By: ____________________________ Kristen Monsell (DC Bar No. CA00060) Emily Jeffers (CA Bar No. 274222) Center for Biolgoical Diversity 1212 Broadway, Suite 800 Oakland, CA 94612 (510) 844-7100 kmonsell@biologicaldiversity.org ejeffers@biologicaldiversity.org
Counsel for Plaintiff Center for Biological Diversity
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS:
Dated: April __, 2022
TODD KIM Assistant Attorney General Environment and Natural Resources Division
By: ____________________________ MARK L. WALTERS U.S. Department of Justice Environment and Natural Resources Division Environmental Defense Section P.O. Box 7611 Washington, DC 20044 Telephone: (202) 616-9190 Fax: (202) 514-8865
Counsel for Defendants the United States Environmental Protection Agency and Michael Regan, in his official capacity as Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
8 CO C OU UNNS SEEL FO FOR PL PLAI AIN NTT TIF IFF IFF::
Date Da ted d:: A Apprriil 202 20 22 2
Byy: B Krris K isteten M Mo ons nseelll ((D DC Ba Bar NNo o. CCAA00 00060 060 06 0)) Em E m milily iilly Je Jeffffe errs ((CCA B Ba ar No No. 27 2742422 222) Cen Ce ntterer for for B fo Biiiol olg ol go oicca all D Diive ive ve ers rrssit sit ity 12 1 21122 B Brrooaadw dwayay, S Su uiitte 800 80 8 00 Oa O akklla an nd, d, CACA 94 946 6112 ((5 510 10) 844-84 8 44 4--71 71 100 00 0 0 kkm mon onsseellll@b ell @bio olo log logi giica calld diivve errssiity ty.o org rg eje ej effffe ers rs@ @b bio olo logi giccaald div iveerrssiity itty y.oorg rg
Cou Co un nsse elfo for Pl Pla Plai aiint ntififCe Cenntte errffo or B Biiiol ollog o ogic ica allD Diive vers rsit ity
COUN COUNSSE EL FO FOR D DEE EFE FE FENDAN NDA ND AN NTS NTS TS:
Dated: AptZ2022 TODD TO ODD DD K KIIM Assssiist A sta ann ntt Ator Ato Atorrrne ne n ey Ge Gene nerra al Envi En viro ronm nmenent a an nd Na nd Natura tura tural Re Resour sso our urcce es D Diiivi vviissiio onn
Byy: B MA M AR RK K L. L. WALT WALT WA LTER TERERS U..S U S.. Depa De D eppa a art rtm rtmeen ntt o off JJuust stic ice En E nvviiiro ron ro nmme en nt an and NNa a atuturra tu al Re Resso ouurrce rce ces Di ces Divviisi sion on En E nvviirro onm nmen entta al D Deeffe efeense ensnse Se ns Seccttio ion P..O P P.O. O.. Box Box 7611 Bo 761 76 11 1 Wa Wash ash shin shin ing gtto onn, D DCC 20 20444 4 Telle Te epph hoonn ne: e:: ((2 e 202 02) 61 6166--9 9119 900 Fax: Fa x: ((2 2002 2) S S1 1 14- 4--88 4 886 8865 65 5
Cou Co Coun un nsse e ell fo for DDeefe f en nd da an ntts s tth he Un he Uniitted ed St Sttatate at ess En E nvviiro ronm nme en nta tal Pr Pro otttec ection ec tition on AgAge en nccyy anand M Miich chaeael Re R eg ga an, n, in in hhiis is oofffifici cciia ciaall ca capacipaci pa city ty as as Ad Adm miinniissttra ratto orr,, Un U nitited ed St Sta attes es EEn nvi viroronm nmen enta tal PPrrrot otec ot ecttiion ioon n Ag Age en ncy cy