Center for Biological Diversit v. Ken Salazar

431 F. App'x 593
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 6, 2011·No. 10-16513·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

*594 In this interlocutory appeal, Appellants challenge the district court’s denial of their motion for a preliminary injunction. Reviewing for abuse of discretion, see Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Cottrell, 632 F.3d 1127, 1131 (9th Cir.2011), we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court judge. Appellants failed to raise serious questions on the merits of them claims of violations of the National Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. § 4321, et seq. and the Federal Land Policy Management Act, 43 U.S.C. § 1701 et seq. See id. at 1132.

AFFIRMED.

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Center for Biological Diversit v. Ken Salazar, 431 F. App'x 593 (9th Cir. 2011).

431 F. App'x 593 (Center for Biological Diversit v. Ken Salazar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Center for Biological Diversit v. Ken Salazar
706 F.3d 1085 (Ninth Circuit, 2013)