Center for Biological Diversit v. Ken Salazar

431 F. App'x 593
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMay 6, 2011
Docket10-16513
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 431 F. App'x 593 (Center for Biological Diversit v. Ken Salazar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Center for Biological Diversit v. Ken Salazar, 431 F. App'x 593 (9th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

*594 In this interlocutory appeal, Appellants challenge the district court’s denial of their motion for a preliminary injunction. Reviewing for abuse of discretion, see Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Cottrell, 632 F.3d 1127, 1131 (9th Cir.2011), we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court judge. Appellants failed to raise serious questions on the merits of them claims of violations of the National Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. § 4321, et seq. and the Federal Land Policy Management Act, 43 U.S.C. § 1701 et seq. See id. at 1132.

AFFIRMED.

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Center for Biological Diversit v. Ken Salazar
706 F.3d 1085 (Ninth Circuit, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
431 F. App'x 593, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/center-for-biological-diversit-v-ken-salazar-ca9-2011.