Center for Auto Safety v. Thomas

D.C. Circuit

Center for Auto Safety v. Thomas

810 F.2d 302, 258 U.S. App. D.C. 183, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 3062

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided February 6, 1987·No. No. 85-1515·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The suggestion for rehearing en bane of intervenors General Motors Corporation and Automobile Importers of America, Inc. has been circulated to the full Court. The taking of a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the Court in regular active service voted in favor of the suggestion. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the suggestion is granted and this matter will be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and it is

FURTHER ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the opinion and judgment of December 2, 1986, 806 F.2d 1071 be, and the same hereby are, vacated.

A future order will govern further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The suggestion for rehearing en bane of intervenors General Motors Corporation and Automobile Importers of America, Inc. has been circulated to the full Court. The taking of a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the Court in regular active service voted in favor of the suggestion. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the suggestion is granted and this matter will be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and it is

FURTHER ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the opinion and judgment of December 2, 1986, 806 F.2d 1071 be, and the same hereby are, vacated.

A future order will govern further proceedings.

Center for Auto Safety v. Thomas, 810 F.2d 302, 258 U.S. App. D.C. 183, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 3062 (D.C. Cir. 1987).

Pincite

810 F.2d 302 (Center for Auto Safety v. Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related