Center for Auto Safety v. Thomas

810 F.2d 302, 258 U.S. App. D.C. 183, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 3062
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedFebruary 6, 1987
DocketNo. 85-1515
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 810 F.2d 302 (Center for Auto Safety v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Center for Auto Safety v. Thomas, 810 F.2d 302, 258 U.S. App. D.C. 183, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 3062 (D.C. Cir. 1987).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The suggestion for rehearing en bane of intervenors General Motors Corporation and Automobile Importers of America, Inc. has been circulated to the full Court. The taking of a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the Court in regular active service voted in favor of the suggestion. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the suggestion is granted and this matter will be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and it is

FURTHER ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the opinion and judgment of December 2, 1986, 806 F.2d 1071 be, and the same hereby are, vacated.

A future order will govern further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Center for Auto Safety v. Thomas
847 F.2d 843 (D.C. Circuit, 1988)
Center For Auto Safety v. Lee M. Thomas
806 F.2d 1071 (D.C. Circuit, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
810 F.2d 302, 258 U.S. App. D.C. 183, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 3062, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/center-for-auto-safety-v-thomas-cadc-1987.