Centeno v. U.S. Bank Nat'l, N.A.

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

MARTIN CENTENO, No 75867 Appellant,

vs.

U.S. BANK NATIONAL, NA., N/K/A U.S. BANK, N.A.; AND NATIONAL DEFAULT SERVICING CORPORATION, 12018 Respondents. El BROWN

BY

( CLERK

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is an appeal from a February 7, 2017, "Civil Order to Statistically Close Case," and two oral orders of the district court closing the case. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; David M. Jones, Judge.

Our review of the notice of appeal and documents before this court reveals jurisdictional defects. An order to statistically close a case is not substantively appealable. Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, 129 Nev. 343, 346-47, 301 P.3d 850, 852-53 (2013). Further, the oral orders of the district court closing the case are ineffective and substantively unappealable. See id.; State, Div. Child & Fam. Services, 120 Nev. 445, 451-54, 92 P.3d 1239, 1243-45 (2004). Because no statute or court rule authorizes an appeal from the challenged orders, Brown, 129 Nev. at 345 P.3d at 851 (this court may only consider appeals that are authorized by court rule or statute), we conclude that we lack jurisdiction and we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

, J.

Parraguirre Stiglich SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(th t947A liW> r- z41901 cc: Hon. David M. Jones, District Judge Martin Centeno Ballard Spahr LLP/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

2

(0) I 947A C1:&