Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Centennial Bank v. NFP 1, LLC

Centennial Bank v. NFP 1, LLC

127 So. 3d 897, 2013 WL 6332452, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 19387
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 5, 2013
DocketNo. 1D13-4516
StatusPublished

This text of 127 So. 3d 897 (Centennial Bank v. NFP 1, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Centennial Bank v. NFP 1, LLC, 127 So. 3d 897, 2013 WL 6332452, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 19387 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Court has determined that the July 15, 2013, Final Judgment is not a final order as it fails to resolve Count II of the complaint, a related claim for damages for [898]*898breach of the associated note. Therefore, this appeal from the July 15, 2013, Final Judgment is premature. Cf. Conti v. B & E Holdings, LLC, 61 So.3d 1272 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (dismissing appeal as premature where order on appeal entered a money judgment but reserved jurisdiction to resolve the related mortgage foreclosure action). Accordingly, appellee’s motion to dismiss, filed on September 26, 2013, is granted, and the appeal is hereby dismissed.

PADOVANO, ROWE, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Conti v. B & E Holdings, LLC
61 So. 3d 1272 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
127 So. 3d 897, 2013 WL 6332452, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 19387, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/centennial-bank-v-nfp-1-llc-fladistctapp-2013.