Centenni v. St. Peter of Alcantara

99 A.D.2d 525, 471 N.Y.S.2d 305, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16737
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 23, 1984·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Oppido, J.), dated September 10,1982, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint upon the ground that plaintiffs were barred from establishing a prima facie case because of their noncompliance with a conditional order of preclusion. Order affirmed, with costs. In the absence of a motion by plaintiffs to vacate their default in timely serving a bill of particulars in accordance with the conditional order of preclusion, defendant was entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Rubin and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Centenni v. St. Peter of Alcantara, 99 A.D.2d 525, 471 N.Y.S.2d 305, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16737 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

99 A.D.2d 525 (Centenni v. St. Peter of Alcantara) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fujah v. V-M Auto Refinishing Corp.
192 Misc. 2d 170 (New York Supreme Court, 2002)
Turbowitz v. Mapeth, Inc.
140 A.D.2d 433 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Trinchera v. Yonkers General Hospital
131 A.D.2d 841 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Tuffo v. Red Coach Realty, Inc.
129 A.D.2d 966 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Bennett v. Sullivan
116 A.D.2d 938 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)