Centenni v. St. Peter of Alcantara
This text of 99 A.D.2d 525 (Centenni v. St. Peter of Alcantara) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Oppido, J.), dated September 10,1982, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint upon the ground that plaintiffs were barred from establishing a prima facie case because of their noncompliance with a conditional order of preclusion. Order affirmed, with costs. In the absence of a motion by plaintiffs to vacate their default in timely serving a bill of particulars in accordance with the conditional order of preclusion, defendant was entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Rubin and Boyers, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
99 A.D.2d 525, 471 N.Y.S.2d 305, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16737, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/centenni-v-st-peter-of-alcantara-nyappdiv-1984.