Centaur Co. v. Reinecke
This text of 91 F. 1001 (Centaur Co. v. Reinecke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The answers in this cause, and in the one against J. M. Neathery in the circuit court of the United States for the Eastern district o,f Texas, show that the said Reinecke and Neathery were at the time of (lie filing of the bills in the respective cases engaged in the manufacture of Castoria; that they were partners in said business, and jointly interested therein. The case made by the bill, answer, and exhibits was identical with that of Centaur Co. v. Neathery, 91 Fed. 891. The two causes were argued and submitted together, and the decision of the court in that case will control in this. The ruling of the circuit court of the United States for the Northern district of Texas herein is reversed, and the said court is directed to issue a preliminary injunction as prayed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
91 F. 1001, 34 C.C.A. 684, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 1869, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/centaur-co-v-reinecke-ca5-1898.