Centaur Co. v. Reinecke

91 F. 1001, 34 C.C.A. 684, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 1869
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 13, 1898·No. No. 759·Published

Opinion

SWAYNE, District Judge.

The answers in this cause, and in the one against J. M. Neathery in the circuit court of the United States for the Eastern district o,f Texas, show that the said Reinecke and Neathery were at the time of (lie filing of the bills in the respective cases engaged in the manufacture of Castoria; that they were partners in said business, and jointly interested therein. The case made by the bill, answer, and exhibits was identical with that of Centaur Co. v. Neathery, 91 Fed. 891. The two causes were argued and submitted together, and the decision of the court in that case will control in this. The ruling of the circuit court of the United States for the Northern district of Texas herein is reversed, and the said court is directed to issue a preliminary injunction as prayed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Centaur Co. v. Reinecke, 91 F. 1001, 34 C.C.A. 684, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 1869 (5th Cir. 1898).

91 F. 1001 (Centaur Co. v. Reinecke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Centaur Co. v. Neathery
91 F. 891 (Fifth Circuit, 1893)