Cement Products Co. v. Bloom

Supreme Court of Florida

Cement Products Co. v. Bloom

126 So. 299, 99 Fla. 242

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 3, 1930·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of" the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for- *243 the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of • its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed. .

Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford; J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of" the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for- *243 the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of • its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed. .

Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford; J. J., concur.

Cement Products Co. v. Bloom, 126 So. 299, 99 Fla. 242 (Fla. 1930).

Pincite

126 So. 299 (Cement Products Co. v. Bloom) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.