C.E.M. Enterprises v. Watson Construction Co.

537 So. 2d 1137, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 407, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 592, 1989 WL 8704
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 9, 1989·No. No. 88-611·Published

Opinion

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This court sua sponte determined the order from which appellant took this appeal is a non-final non-appealable order granting a motion for summary judgment. It is not an appeal from a summary judgment.

Although given an opportunity to request leave to obtain a judgment, Lawler v. Harris, 418 So.2d 1239 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982), appellant chose not to do so and urges us to find jurisdiction because the parties intended the order to be a judgment and treated it as such. Jurisdiction cannot be conferred where none exists nor can the parties agree to jurisdiction. Cates v. Heffeman, 154 Fla. 422, 18 So.2d 11, 16 (Fla.1944), (Brown, J., concurring specially); International Studio Apt. Ass’n., Inc. v. Sun Holiday Resorts, 375 So.2d 335 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979), cert. den., 383 So.2d 1196 (Fla.1980).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

SHARP, C.J., and GOSHORN, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

C.E.M. Enterprises v. Watson Construction Co., 537 So. 2d 1137, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 407, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 592, 1989 WL 8704 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

537 So. 2d 1137 (C.E.M. Enterprises v. Watson Construction Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lawler v. Harris
418 So. 2d 1239 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
INTERN. STUDIO APT. ASS'N v. Sun Holiday Resorts, Inc.
375 So. 2d 335 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Cates v. Heffernan
18 So. 2d 11 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1944)