C.E.M. Enterprises v. Watson Construction Co.
This text of 537 So. 2d 1137 (C.E.M. Enterprises v. Watson Construction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This court sua sponte determined the order from which appellant took this appeal is a non-final non-appealable order granting a motion for summary judgment. It is not an appeal from a summary judgment.
Although given an opportunity to request leave to obtain a judgment, Lawler v. Harris, 418 So.2d 1239 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982), appellant chose not to do so and urges us to find jurisdiction because the parties intended the order to be a judgment and treated it as such. Jurisdiction cannot be conferred where none exists nor can the parties agree to jurisdiction. Cates v. Heffeman, 154 Fla. 422, 18 So.2d 11, 16 (Fla.1944), (Brown, J., concurring specially); International Studio Apt. Ass’n., Inc. v. Sun Holiday Resorts, 375 So.2d 335 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979), cert. den., 383 So.2d 1196 (Fla.1980).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
537 So. 2d 1137, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 407, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 592, 1989 WL 8704, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cem-enterprises-v-watson-construction-co-fladistctapp-1989.