Celvin Brooks v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 15, 2018·No. 01-18-00175-CR·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-18-00175-CR Style: Celvin Brooks v. The State of Texas Date motion filed*: May 8, 2018 Type of motion: Motion to Withdraw Party filing motion: Appellant’s Appointed Counsel, Jani J. Maselli Wood Document to be filed: N/A

Is appeal accelerated? No.

Ordered that motion is:  Granted  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ Appellant’s motion to withdraw, construed as a motion to substitute counsel, is granted because it complies with Rule 6.5 by referring to a notice of appearance of counsel filed by newly-retained counsel David Booker. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5(b), (d). The Clerk of this Court is directed to remove Jani J. Maselli Wood as counsel for appellant and to substitute David Booker as appellant’s lead counsel of record, if not done so already. See id. 6.1(c), 6.2. Ms. Wood is ordered to mail a copy of her motion and this order to the pro se appellant and file notice with the Clerk of this Court within 10 days of this order. See id. 6.5(b), (d).

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes  Acting for the Court

Date: May 15, 2018

November 7, 2008 Revision

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Celvin Brooks v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Celvin Brooks v. State (Celvin Brooks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.