Celtic Life Insurance Co. v. Brown

850 So. 2d 322, 2002 Ala. LEXIS 320
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided November 1, 2002·No. 1011007 and 1011237·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

HOUSTON, Justice.

The sole issue in these consolidated appeals is whether the Barbour Circuit Court erred when it denied the appellants’ motions to compel arbitration on the basis that the relevant arbitration agreement bars the arbitrator from awarding punitive damages (although the right to enforce this provision was waived) and contains no severability clause. The initial briefs in this case were filed before the release of our decision in Ex parte Celtic Life Insurance Co., 834 So.2d 766 (Ala.2002), which involved the same arbitration agreement and the same issue, and which is therefore dispositive of these appeals. In accordance with Ex parte Celtic Life Insurance Co., we reverse the trial court’s order denying the appellants’ motions to compel arbitration and remand the cases for further proceedings.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

LYONS, BROWN, JOHNSTONE, HARWOOD, WOODALL, and STUART, JJ., concur. MOORE, C.J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Celtic Life Insurance Co. v. Brown, 850 So. 2d 322, 2002 Ala. LEXIS 320 (Ala. 2002).

850 So. 2d 322 (Celtic Life Insurance Co. v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Britt v. Shelby County Health Care Auth.
850 So. 2d 322 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 2001)