Celso Martinez v. Pinnacle Partners Financial Corporation

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 9, 2011·No. 04-10-00819-CV·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-10-00819-CV

Celso MARTINEZ, Appellant

v.

PINNACLE PARTNERS FINANCIAL CORPORATION, Appellee

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2010-CI-02440 Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr., Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 9, 2011

DISMISSED

The clerk’s record was due on January 3, 2011, and has not been filed. On December 27,

2010, the trial court clerk filed a notification of late record stating that appellant had failed to pay

or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record, and appellant is not

entitled to appeal without paying the fee. On December 29, 2010, this court ordered appellant to

show cause in writing by January 10, 2011, why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of 04-10-00819-CV

prosecution. Appellant did not respond. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of

prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). Costs of the appeal are taxed against appellant.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Celso Martinez v. Pinnacle Partners Financial Corporation, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Celso Martinez v. Pinnacle Partners Financial Corporation (Celso Martinez v. Pinnacle Partners Financial Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.