Celso Martinez v. Pinnacle Partners Financial Corporation
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-10-00819-CV
Celso MARTINEZ, Appellant
v.
PINNACLE PARTNERS FINANCIAL CORPORATION, Appellee
From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2010-CI-02440 Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr., Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice
Delivered and Filed: February 9, 2011
DISMISSED
The clerk’s record was due on January 3, 2011, and has not been filed. On December 27,
2010, the trial court clerk filed a notification of late record stating that appellant had failed to pay
or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record, and appellant is not
entitled to appeal without paying the fee. On December 29, 2010, this court ordered appellant to
show cause in writing by January 10, 2011, why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of 04-10-00819-CV
prosecution. Appellant did not respond. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of
prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). Costs of the appeal are taxed against appellant.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Celso Martinez v. Pinnacle Partners Financial Corporation (Celso Martinez v. Pinnacle Partners Financial Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.