Celotex Corp. v. Foytik
This text of 597 So. 2d 869 (Celotex Corp. v. Foytik) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm the final judgment. The testimony appellant claims should have been excluded was cumulative and any error in its admission was harmless. Butcher v. Miami Elevator Co., 568 So.2d 61, 63 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Metropolitan Dade County v. Coats, 559 So.2d 71, 73 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 569 So.2d 1279 (Fla.1990).
The remaining issue on appeal was not preserved for review. Middelveen v. Sibson Realty, Inc., 417 So.2d 275 (Fla. 5th DCA), review denied, 424 So.2d 762 (Fla. 1982); Lollie v. General Motors Corp., 407 So.2d 613 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981), review denied, 413 So.2d 876 (Fla.1982); DuPuis v. 79th St. Hotel, Inc., 231 So.2d 532 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 238 So.2d 105 (Fla.1970).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
597 So. 2d 869, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 3931, 1992 WL 69021, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/celotex-corp-v-foytik-fladistctapp-1992.