Celo v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Celo v. State

179 S.W. 99, 77 Tex. Crim. 538, 1915 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 119

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 16, 1915·No. No. 3622.·Published

Opinion

*539 HARPER, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of unlawfully carrying a pistol, and prosecutes this appeal.

The term of court at which he was tried adjourned October 31, 1914. Ho bills of exception are in the record, and the statement of facts shows to not have been approved nor filed until January 20, 1915, eighty-one days after court adjourned. This being a misdemeanor the State’s motion to strike out the statement of facts is sustained.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed

[Rehearing denied October 13, 1915.—Reporter.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*539 HARPER, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of unlawfully carrying a pistol, and prosecutes this appeal.

The term of court at which he was tried adjourned October 31, 1914. Ho bills of exception are in the record, and the statement of facts shows to not have been approved nor filed until January 20, 1915, eighty-one days after court adjourned. This being a misdemeanor the State’s motion to strike out the statement of facts is sustained.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed

[Rehearing denied October 13, 1915.—Reporter.]

Celo v. State, 179 S.W. 99, 77 Tex. Crim. 538, 1915 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 119 (Tex. 1915).

Pincite

179 S.W. 99 (Celo v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.