Celmer v. Rodgers

847 N.E.2d 5, 109 Ohio St. 3d 1455
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Celmer v. Rodgers. Read the opinion of the Court — 114 Ohio St. 3d 221
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 10, 2006·No. 2006-0305·Published

Opinion

Trumbull App. No. 2004-T-0074, 2005-Ohio-7054.

Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent.

Motion to consolidate with 2006-0304, Celmer v. Rodgers, Trumbull App. No. 2004-T-0083, 2005-Ohio-7055, denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Celmer v. Rodgers, 847 N.E.2d 5, 109 Ohio St. 3d 1455 (Ohio 2006).

847 N.E.2d 5 (Celmer v. Rodgers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Celmer v. Rodgers, Unpublished Decision (12-29-2005)
2005 Ohio 7055 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2005)
Celmer v. Rodgers, Unpublished Decision (12-29-2005)
2005 Ohio 7054 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2005)