Celmer v. Rodgers

847 N.E.2d 5, 109 Ohio St. 3d 1455
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMay 10, 2006
Docket2006-0305
StatusPublished

This text of 847 N.E.2d 5 (Celmer v. Rodgers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Celmer v. Rodgers, 847 N.E.2d 5, 109 Ohio St. 3d 1455 (Ohio 2006).

Opinion

Trumbull App. No. 2004-T-0074, 2005-Ohio-7054.

Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent.

Motion to consolidate with 2006-0304, Celmer v. Rodgers, Trumbull App. No. 2004-T-0083, 2005-Ohio-7055, denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Celmer v. Rodgers, Unpublished Decision (12-29-2005)
2005 Ohio 7055 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2005)
Celmer v. Rodgers, Unpublished Decision (12-29-2005)
2005 Ohio 7054 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
847 N.E.2d 5, 109 Ohio St. 3d 1455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/celmer-v-rodgers-ohio-2006.