Celmer v. Feinborough Homes, Inc.
253 A.D. 832, 1 N.Y.S.2d 598, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8829
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 21, 1938·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
In an action on a bond, judgment in favor of the plaintiffs unanimously affirmed, with costs. On September 9, 1932, when the general release was given, there had been no default under the bond or mortgage. Consequently, the plaintiffs had at that time no right of action against the defendant on the bond. The right of action which arose subsequently was not discharged by the release. (Farnham v. Farnham, 204 App. Div. 573.) Present — Hagarty, Carswell, Davis, Adel and Close, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Celmer v. Feinborough Homes, Inc., 253 A.D. 832, 1 N.Y.S.2d 598, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8829 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).
253 A.D. 832 (Celmer v. Feinborough Homes, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lucio v. Curran
139 N.E.2d 133 (New York Court of Appeals, 1956)
In re the Second Intermediate Accounting of Slocum
274 A.D. 871 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1948)
Morris v. Moglen
269 A.D. 984 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1945)
Altman v. Curtiss-Wright Corp.
124 F.2d 177 (Second Circuit, 1941)