Cellwitch Inc. v. Tile, Inc.

Opinion

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 OAKLAND DIVISION 11 CELLWITCH INC., Case No. 4:19-CV-01315-JSW

12 Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 13 v. DEFENDANT TILE, INC.’S MOTION TO MAINTAIN STAY AS TO DISCOVERY 14 TILE, INC., Judge: Jeffrey S. White 15 Defendant.

16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ] Defendant Tile, Inc.’s (“Tile’s”) Motion to Maintain Discovery □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ 2 || the-Courtentuby 29.2022. Based on the papers submitted and-arguments-madebycounsel atthe 3 || hearing, the Court finds that good cause exists for maintaining the stay of this case as to discovery 4 || pending the resolution of Tile’s Motion for Leave to File a Motion for Reconsideration of the 5 || Court’s Nov. 21, 2019 Order Denying Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 57), including the 6 || resolution of any motion for reconsideration that the Court authorizes Tile to file. See Jarvis v. Regan, 833 F.2d 149, 155 (9th Cir. 1987); Wood v. McEwen, 644 F.2d 797, 801 (9th Cir. 1981); 8 || Pac. Lumber Co. vy. Nat’l Union Fire Ins. Co., 220 F.R.D. 349, 352 (N.D. Cal. 2003). 9 Accordingly, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) and the Court’s discretion, IT IS 10 |} HEREBY ORDERED that Tile’s Motion to Maintain Stay as to Discovery is GRANTED. 11 || Discovery is stayed in this matter pending resolution of Tile’s Motion for Leave to File a Motion 12 || for Reconsideration of the Court’s Nov. 21, 2019 Order Denying Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss 13 |} (Dkt. 57), including the resolution of any motion for reconsideration that the Court authorizes Tile 14 || to file. 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. 16 : 17|| Dated: July 25, 2022 JEFFRAY, TE 18 United States District Judge 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 “[PROPOSEDJORDERGRANTINGTILES | ©