Cellini v. NEEDLEMAN
218 A.2d 839, 207 Pa. Super. 762, 1966 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1274
This text of 218 A.2d 839 (Cellini v. NEEDLEMAN) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cellini v. NEEDLEMAN, 218 A.2d 839, 207 Pa. Super. 762, 1966 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1274 (Pa. Ct. App. 1966).
Opinion
Cellini
v.
Needleman et al., Appellants.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania.
Gerald J. Cohen, for appellants.
Irvin Siegel, for appellee.
Judgment affirmed.
ERVIN, P.J., and WRIGHT, J., dissented.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Meta v. Yellow Cab Co.
294 A.2d 898 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1972)
Elliott v. Lenzi
249 A.2d 925 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1968)
Fitzgerald v. Chapman
229 A.2d 12 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1967)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
218 A.2d 839, 207 Pa. Super. 762, 1966 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cellini-v-needleman-pasuperct-1966.