Celli v. New York City

Opinion

Lehruburger, | UNITED STATES District Court Your Honor holdoff the mandamus is in 25-cv-2030, as it For the Southern District of New York with your criminal for Randi 2025-cv-02031 and the UFT | know you will Your Honot Lucio Celli v Pres T because you were bribed to UCIO Vel VFres Irump, 24-cv-9743 ensure Randi Weingarten and UFT get away with crimes anc prevent them from being termir EMERGENCY MOTION FOR STAY OF PROCEEDINGS Your order came out the □□□□ the UFT was served in 25-cv-99 PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ANY ORDER IN CASE NO. 24-cv-97443 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 8(a)(2) and the Court’s inherent authority, Plaintiff-Appellant Lucio Celli, proceeding pro se, respectfully moves for an immediate stay of proceedings in this appeal and the underlying case before any further judicial order is issued. This motion is based on documented judicial misconduct, evidence suppression, conflict of interest, and criminal manipulation of the appellate record involving court personnel and politically connected third parties, specifically Randi Weingarten and Clerk Wolfe.

Please Take Notice, Wolfe and Livingston are at the center of depriving me of HIV meds for Schumer and Randi ADDITIONAL GROUNDS FOR STAY 1. Misuse of Public Office and Political Retaliation — Kelly v. United States The Supreme Court in Kelly v. United States, 140 S. Ct. 1565 (2020), reaffirmed that it is unlawful for public officials to abuse government mechanisms for political retribution or personal advantage. Here, Appellant alleges that Randi Weingarten—a politically connected figure—leveraged her influence to orchestrate adverse rulings and suppress employment rights, health care access, and wages. Denied as vexatious and frivolous. Case No. 25-CV-2030 is a product-liability case captioned Hoey v. The 3M Company and has no relation to the instant case. $0 ORDERED: 05/05/2025 je-—