CELLEY v. Stevens

729 N.W.2d 871, 477 Mich. 1113

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in CELLEY v. Stevens. Read the opinion of the Court — 471 Mich. 893 →

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided April 24, 2007·No. 132851·Published

Opinion

729 N.W.2d 871 (2007)

Todd M. CELLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Kathleen M. STEVENS, Defendant-Appellee.

Docket No. 132851. COA No. 273846.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

April 24, 2007.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 2, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

729 N.W.2d 871 (2007)

Todd M. CELLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Kathleen M. STEVENS, Defendant-Appellee.

Docket No. 132851. COA No. 273846.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

April 24, 2007.

CELLEY v. Stevens, 729 N.W.2d 871, 477 Mich. 1113 (Mich. 2007).

Pincite

729 N.W.2d 871 (CELLEY v. Stevens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Todd M. CELLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kathleen M. STEVENS, Defendant-Appellee.

Todd M. CELLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Kathleen M. STEVENS, Defendant-Appellee.