Cellar of Jeans "N" Jewels, Inc. v. Rose & Kiernan, Inc.

77 A.D.2d 703, 430 N.Y.S.2d 397, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12437

This text of 77 A.D.2d 703 (Cellar of Jeans "N" Jewels, Inc. v. Rose & Kiernan, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cellar of Jeans "N" Jewels, Inc. v. Rose & Kiernan, Inc., 77 A.D.2d 703, 430 N.Y.S.2d 397, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12437 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered September 13, 1979 in Albany County, which granted defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s second cause of action for failure to state a cause of action. Since defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s second cause of action under CPLR 3211 (subd [a], par 7) was not supported by extrinsic proof, the only issue before Special Term was whether it stated a cause of action (cf. Rovello v Orofino Realty Co., 40 NY2d 633; Wolcott v Broughton, 57 AD2d 1022). Despite plaintiff’s failure to oppose the motion, we conclude that it does and reverse Special Term’s order. Accepting the allegation of this poorly drafted complaint as true, the second cause of action may be fairly deciphered as spelling out a claim that defendants negligently failed to procure certain insurance coverage requested by plaintiff and compounded the damage to its financial position after a loss by causing plaintiff to rely on a negligently made representation that a settlement would be made. If proven, plaintiff would be entitled to recover (see 29 NY Jur, Insurance, §§ 457-468) and, therefore, the instant cause of action may not presently be dismissed for legal insufficiency. Order reversed, on the law, and motion denied, without costs. Greenblott, J. P., Kane, Staley, Jr., Mikoll and Casey, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rovello v. Orofino Realty Co.
357 N.E.2d 970 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)
Wolcott v. Broughton
57 A.D.2d 1022 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
77 A.D.2d 703, 430 N.Y.S.2d 397, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cellar-of-jeans-n-jewels-inc-v-rose-kiernan-inc-nyappdiv-1980.